What's With The EPS?
I saw a few definitions for EPS. None of them satisfied me.
They all explained the math, and that was fine. But I don't see how that correlates to how well a company is doing.
So here's an example:
Company A makes $1000 profit and has 500 outstanding shares. Therefore, the EPS is $2
Company B makes $1000 profit and has 1000 outstanding shares. Therefore, the EPS is $1
Given that both companies had equal profit and assuming all other things being equal, then to me, neither company is better than the other. However, based on the definition of EPS, company B is better because it has a higher EPS.
And it has a higher EPS simply because it has less outstanding shares? What does the number of outstanding shares have to do with how good or profitable a company is?
Then I found a definition that made more sense to me. It said:
" Basic Earnings per share (Basic EPS) tells an investor how much of the company's profit belongs to each share of stock. If company ABC reported earnings of $100 million dollars and had 20 million shares outstanding, the basic EPS would be $5 ($100 million earnings ÷ 20 million shares outstanding = $5 per share). The figure is important because it allows analysts to value the stock based on the price to earnings ratio (or p/e ratio for short)."
It is the last sentence that made sense to me; i.e. "The figure is important because it allows analysts to value the stock based on the price to earnings ratio (or p/e ratio for short)."
I other words, EPS is the "e" in the p/e ratio. So if company A has a p/e ratio of 3 and company B has a p/e ratio of 2, then that tells me that investors will pay more for company A then B even though they have equal profits, which in turn tells me that they see more up-side for company A.
If I'm correct about this then that brings up another issue. If EPS is only used for calculating the p/e ratio, then what's its purpose as a standalone statistic?